More WNBA Games |
Swipe left to see more →
| Sunday, 08/03/2025 3:00 PM (ET) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gm# | Record | Open | Latest | ML | 1H | |
 IND | 625 | 17-12 | 159.5 | 161 | +120 | 81.5 |
 SEA | 626 | 16-12 | -3.5 | -2.5 | -140 | -1.5 |
Matchup Content Menu |
Swipe left to see more →
WNBA Simulation & Power Ratings |
Power Rating Projections |
Swipe left to see more →
| Power Rating | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Teams | Rating | Estimate | Actual | Edge |
| IND | 83 | IND (+2.5) | ||
| SEA | 81 | 0 | -2.5 | |
Game Simulation Results |
Swipe left to see more →
| Average projected scores and game statistics. | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scores, Edges | Shooting | 3pt Shooting | Free Throws | Rebounding | |||||||||||
| Teams | Score | Edge | H1Score | Edge | 3FGM-A | Pct. | 3FGM-A | Pct. | FTM-A | Pct. | Tot. | OFF | TO | ||
| IND | 81 | IND (+1.5) | Ov (+1.3) | 40 | IND (+0.5) | Ov (+0.2) | 30-67 | 44.2% | 8-25 | 33.4% | 13-16 | 81.0% | 43 | 8 | 15 |
| SEA | 82 | 41 | 31-69 | 45.1% | 7-23 | 32.4% | 12-16 | 78.1% | 41 | 7 | 12 | ||||
Swipe left to see more →
| The number of simulations in which each team covered the current spread, won the game straight up, and number of simulations which went over or under the current total are listed below. Edges are indicated where one side enjoyed a significant advantage against the line or total. | |
 | In 1000 simulated games, Indiana covered the spread 541 times, while Seattle covered the spread 459 times. No Edge. |
| In 1000 simulated games, 516 games went over the total, while 452 games went under the total. No Edge. |
 | In 1000 simulated games, Seattle won the game straight up 515 times, while Indiana won 453 times. No Edge. |
 | In 1000 simulated games, Indiana covered the first half line 527 times, while Seattle covered the first half line 473 times. No Edge. |
| In 1000 simulated games, 512 games went over the first half total, while 488 games went under the first half total. No Edge. |
 | In 1000 simulated games, Seattle covered the 4 point teaser line 577 times, and failed to cover 423 times. No Edge. |
| In 1000 simulated games, Indiana covered the 4 point teaser line 644 times, and failed to cover 356 times. No Edge. |
| In 1000 simulated games, 624 games went over the 4 point teaser total, while 364 failed to go over. No Edge. |
| In 1000 simulated games, 565 games went under the 4 point teaser total, while 406 failed to go under. No Edge. |
Potential Trends Based On Simulator Projection |
| Trends Favoring Indiana. | |
|---|---|
| Bet against Seattle in away games in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers. Seattle record during the 2025 season: 0-8 (0%) ATS with an average line of -8.8. (-8.8 unit$, ROI=-100.0%). The average score of these games was Storm 81.6, Opponents 82.6. |
| Bet against Seattle in away games on the money line when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game. Seattle record since the 2024 season: 1-6 (14%) with an average money line of -315. (-19.0 unit$, ROI=-85.9%) The average score of these games was Storm 81.4, Opponents 83.0. |
| Bet against Seattle in away games on the money line in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers. Seattle record during the 2025 season: 1-5 (17%) with an average money line of -310. (-12.0 unit$, ROI=-64.2%) The average score of these games was Storm 81.6, Opponents 82.6. |
Teams: The names and logos of the basketball teams being compared in the simulation.
Rating: The power rating assigned to the team, indicating its overall strength based on various factors like performance, statistics, and other metrics.
Score: The average projected final score for each team based on the simulation.
Estimate: The estimated point spread or line based on the power rating comparison between the two teams.
Edge: Indicates a potential betting advantage if the estimated score or line differs significantly from the actual betting line.
H1Score: The average projected score for each team at the end of the first half.
3FGM-A: The average number of three-point field goals made and attempted by the team.
Pct. (3pt Shooting): The average shooting percentage for three-point field goals.
FTM-A: The average number of free throws made and attempted by the team.
Pct. (Free Throws): The average free throw shooting percentage.
Tot. (Rebounding): The average total number of rebounds (both offensive and defensive) secured by the team.
OFF (Rebounding): The average number of offensive rebounds secured by the team.
TO: The average number of turnovers committed by the team.