| More WNBA Games |
Swipe left to see more →
| Wednesday, 07/09/2025 12:00 PM (ET) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gm# | Record | Open | Latest | ML | 1H | |
 GS | 603 | 9-9 | 161.5 | 160.5 | +210 | 81.5 |
 IND | 604 | 10-9 | -6.5 | -6.5 | -270 | -3.5 |
| Matchup Content Menu |
Swipe left to see more →
Tip SheetSimulation & Ratings🔒Betting Systems🔒Team Trends🔒Team StatsSchedule & ResultsHead-to-Head🔒Coaches🔒
| Key Coaching Trends |
| Key Coaching Trends Favoring Golden State. | |
|---|---|
 | Bet on Natalie Nakase on the money line after a game where they failed to cover the spread. Nakase's record as coach of GOLDEN STATE: 4-1 (80%) with an average money line of +312. (+12.1 unit$, ROI=242.0%) The average score of these games was GOLDEN STATE 83.5, Opponents 74.7 |
| Bet against Stephanie White on the money line after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games. White's record as coach of INDIANA: 7-14 (33%) with an average money line of -152. (-20.1 unit$, ROI=-62.9%) The average score of these games was INDIANA 78.0, Opponents 80.2 |
| Bet against Stephanie White on the money line versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game. White's record as coach of INDIANA: 4-7 (36%) with an average money line of -280. (-21.5 unit$, ROI=-69.8%) The average score of these games was INDIANA 80.4, Opponents 77.9 |
 | Bet on Natalie Nakase on the 1st half line after a game where they failed to cover the spread. Nakase's record on the 1st half line as coach of GOLDEN STATE: 6-0 (100%) with an average line of +5.0. (+6.0 unit$, ROI=90.9%) The average 1st half score of these games was GOLDEN STATE 39.0, Opponents 34.8 |
| Bet on Natalie Nakase on the 1st half line versus the first half line in all games. Nakase's record on the 1st half line as coach of GOLDEN STATE: 14-3 (82%) with an average line of +3.5. (+10.7 unit$, ROI=54.0%) The average 1st half score of these games was GOLDEN STATE 41.0, Opponents 38.3 |
| Bet on Natalie Nakase on the 1st half line as an underdog vs. the 1rst half line. Nakase's record on the 1st half line as coach of GOLDEN STATE: 13-3 (81%) with an average line of +5.0. (+9.7 unit$, ROI=55.1%) The average 1st half score of these games was GOLDEN STATE 40.0, Opponents 38.9 |
| Bet on Natalie Nakase on the 1st half line as a underdog of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line. Nakase's record on the 1st half line as coach of GOLDEN STATE: 8-1 (89%) with an average line of +3.5. (+6.9 unit$, ROI=69.7%) The average 1st half score of these games was GOLDEN STATE 38.9, Opponents 37.9 |
| Bet on Natalie Nakase on the 1st half line in May, June, or July games. Nakase's record on the 1st half line as coach of GOLDEN STATE: 14-3 (82%) with an average line of +3.5. (+10.7 unit$, ROI=54.0%) The average 1st half score of these games was GOLDEN STATE 41.0, Opponents 38.3 |
| Bet on Natalie Nakase on the 1st half line after a non-conference game. Nakase's record on the 1st half line as coach of GOLDEN STATE: 6-0 (100%) with an average line of +2.5. (+6.0 unit$, ROI=77.9%) The average 1st half score of these games was GOLDEN STATE 44.7, Opponents 37.4 |
| Bet on Natalie Nakase on the 1st half line when playing 5 or less games in 14 days. Nakase's record on the 1st half line as coach of GOLDEN STATE: 9-1 (90%) with an average line of +3.5. (+7.9 unit$, ROI=71.8%) The average 1st half score of these games was GOLDEN STATE 44.0, Opponents 39.2 |
| Bet on Natalie Nakase on the 1st half line after 1 or more consecutive losses. Nakase's record on the 1st half line as coach of GOLDEN STATE: 7-0 (100%) with an average line of +3.5. (+7.0 unit$, ROI=79.5%) The average 1st half score of these games was GOLDEN STATE 41.1, Opponents 38.0 |
| Bet on Natalie Nakase on the 1st half line versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game. Nakase's record on the 1st half line as coach of GOLDEN STATE: 8-1 (89%) with an average line of +2.5. (+6.9 unit$, ROI=62.7%) The average 1st half score of these games was GOLDEN STATE 42.5, Opponents 36.4 |
| Bet on Natalie Nakase on the 1st half line when playing against a team with a winning record. Nakase's record on the 1st half line as coach of GOLDEN STATE: 11-1 (92%) with an average line of +5.5. (+9.9 unit$, ROI=75.0%) The average 1st half score of these games was GOLDEN STATE 39.7, Opponents 38.6 |
| Bet on Natalie Nakase on the 1st half line versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game. Nakase's record on the 1st half line as coach of GOLDEN STATE: 6-0 (100%) with an average line of +5.0. (+6.0 unit$, ROI=90.9%) The average 1st half score of these games was GOLDEN STATE 41.3, Opponents 42.0 |
| Bet on Natalie Nakase on the 1st half line versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 83+ points/game. Nakase's record on the 1st half line as coach of GOLDEN STATE: 6-0 (100%) with an average line of +5.0. (+6.0 unit$, ROI=90.9%) The average 1st half score of these games was GOLDEN STATE 41.3, Opponents 42.0 |
| Key Coaching Trends Favoring Indiana. | |
|---|---|
| Bet on Stephanie White in home games on the 1st half line after 2 consecutive non-conference games. White's record on the 1st half line as coach of INDIANA: 11-1 (92%) with an average line of -1.5. (+9.9 unit$, ROI=75.0%) The average 1st half score of these games was INDIANA 44.1, Opponents 37.8 |
| Bet on Stephanie White in home games on the 1st half line after a non-conference game. White's record on the 1st half line as coach of INDIANA: 15-4 (79%) with an average line of -1.5. (+10.6 unit$, ROI=50.7%) The average 1st half score of these games was INDIANA 43.2, Opponents 37.1 |
| Key Coaching Trends Favoring Under. | |
|---|---|
 | Bet under the total in Stephanie White games after one or more consecutive overs. The Under's record as coach of INDIANA: 6-0 (100%) with an average over/under of 164.9. (+6.0 unit$, ROI=90.9%) The average score of these games was INDIANA 80.0, Opponents 75.0 |
| Natalie Nakase Coach Trends |
Swipe left to see more →
| Natalie Nakase - betting records as head coach. | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career records as head coach of Golden State. | |||||||
| Game | Money Line | 1st Half | |||||
| Description | ATS | O/U | W-L | Unit$ | ATS | O/U | |
| against Eastern conference opponents | 5-3 | 2-4 | 4-4 | +7.3 | 6-1 | 3-5 | |
| in all games | 10-7 | 6-10 | 9-9 | +17.6 | 14-3 | 6-12 | |
| as an underdog | 9-6 | 5-9 | 7-9 | +15.6 | 13-3 | 5-11 | |
| in all games where where the total is between 160 and 169.5 points | 6-3 | 2-6 | 4-6 | +9.3 | 7-3 | 4-6 | |
| as an underdog of 3.5 to 9.5 points | 5-4 | 3-6 | 4-5 | +4.3 | 8-1 | 3-6 | |
| as a road underdog | 3-5 | 3-4 | 2-6 | +2 | 5-3 | 3-5 | |
| in road games | 3-5 | 3-4 | 2-6 | +2 | 5-3 | 3-5 | |
| in a road game where where the total is between 160 and 169.5 points | 3-2 | 1-3 | 2-3 | +5 | 2-3 | 2-3 | |
| as a road underdogs of 3.5 to 9.5 points | 1-3 | 3-1 | 1-3 | -0.8 | 3-1 | 2-2 | |
| in May, June, or July games | 10-7 | 6-10 | 9-9 | +17.6 | 14-3 | 6-12 | |
| on Wednesdays | 2-0 | 0-2 | 1-1 | +0.8 | 2-0 | 1-1 | |
| in July games | 0-2 | 1-1 | 0-2 | -2 | 2-0 | 1-1 | |
| when playing 5 or less games in 14 days | 5-4 | 4-5 | 4-6 | +8 | 9-1 | 4-6 | |
| when playing 3 or less games in 10 days | 1-4 | 1-2 | 1-4 | +2.5 | 3-2 | 1-4 | |
| when playing their 3rd road game in 5 days | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | |
| off a road loss | 3-1 | 3-1 | 2-3 | +7.5 | 5-0 | 2-3 | |
| after playing a road game | 4-2 | 3-2 | 3-4 | +11 | 6-1 | 2-5 | |
| after 2 or more consecutive losses | 1-1 | 3-0 | 1-2 | +2 | 3-0 | 1-2 | |
| versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts | 6-1 | 3-4 | 5-3 | +14 | 7-1 | 3-5 | |
| versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game | 7-5 | 6-6 | 7-6 | +13 | 10-2 | 5-8 | |
| versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game | 7-5 | 6-6 | 7-6 | +13 | 10-2 | 5-8 | |
| versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots | 5-1 | 2-4 | 4-3 | +10 | 6-1 | 3-4 | |
| versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game | 7-5 | 6-6 | 7-6 | +13 | 10-2 | 5-8 | |
| when playing against a team with a winning record | 7-4 | 4-6 | 5-7 | +11.6 | 11-1 | 3-9 | |
| when playing against a marginal winning team (Win Pct. 51% to 60%) | 2-0 | 0-1 | 2-0 | +9 | 2-0 | 0-2 | |
| versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game | 3-2 | 2-3 | 2-4 | +3.3 | 6-0 | 3-3 | |
| versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season | 1-1 | 1-0 | 1-1 | +4.5 | 2-0 | 1-1 | |
| versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game | 6-4 | 5-5 | 5-6 | +11 | 9-2 | 4-7 | |
| versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game | 4-3 | 3-3 | 5-2 | +11.2 | 4-2 | 3-4 | |
| Stephanie White Coach Trends |
Swipe left to see more →
| Stephanie White - betting records as head coach. | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career records as a head coach. | Games as head coach of Indiana. | |||||||||||
| Game | Money Line | 1st Half | Game | Money Line | 1st Half | |||||||
| Description | ATS | O/U | W-L | Unit$ | ATS | O/U | ATS | O/U | W-L | Unit$ | ATS | O/U |
| against Western conference opponents | 44-47 | 43-46 | 53-39 | -9 | 47-42 | 43-49 | 22-21 | 21-22 | 22-22 | -5.7 | 26-17 | 19-25 |
| in all games | 97-90 | 94-95 | 115-78 | -8.2 | 104-83 | 90-99 | 50-45 | 49-49 | 53-46 | -10.3 | 57-39 | 44-54 |
| as a favorite | 54-49 | 54-49 | 80-27 | -17.2 | 57-46 | 56-49 | 20-21 | 25-17 | 28-15 | -22.8 | 24-17 | 21-21 |
| in home games | 43-51 | 57-39 | 58-39 | -31.1 | 55-38 | 47-47 | 21-25 | 30-19 | 27-22 | -18.6 | 29-18 | 25-23 |
| in all games where where the total is between 160 and 169.5 points | 36-39 | 34-41 | 43-35 | -10.8 | 45-30 | 35-42 | 15-18 | 16-18 | 16-19 | -17.9 | 21-13 | 16-19 |
| as a favorite of 3.5 to 9.5 points | 38-33 | 39-34 | 54-20 | -7.2 | 40-32 | 37-35 | 17-15 | 20-13 | 22-11 | -7 | 18-13 | 14-18 |
| as a home favorite | 31-37 | 41-28 | 49-21 | -26.9 | 39-27 | 35-34 | 13-17 | 21-11 | 20-12 | -19.3 | 19-11 | 16-15 |
| as a home favorite of 3.5 to 9.5 points | 19-24 | 26-18 | 28-16 | -21.8 | 25-17 | 20-23 | 11-13 | 17-8 | 15-10 | -12.2 | 14-9 | 11-13 |
| in a home game where where the total is between 160 and 169.5 points | 17-22 | 19-21 | 23-18 | -7.9 | 28-12 | 17-23 | 7-11 | 9-11 | 10-10 | -9 | 14-6 | 10-10 |
| in May, June, or July games | 55-52 | 56-50 | 67-42 | -7.5 | 60-47 | 53-54 | 10-9 | 7-11 | 10-9 | -16.1 | 13-6 | 7-11 |
| in July games | 22-11 | 16-17 | 23-11 | +1.5 | 18-14 | 17-16 | 2-1 | 1-2 | 2-1 | +4.1 | 3-0 | 1-2 |
| on Wednesdays | 10-10 | 12-8 | 11-10 | -1.4 | 13-8 | 11-10 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | -1.8 | 0-1 | 1-0 |
| when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days | 64-66 | 63-68 | 82-52 | -3.3 | 70-59 | 72-60 | 7-6 | 3-9 | 8-5 | -9.8 | 9-4 | 4-9 |
| off a home loss | 23-12 | 16-19 | 23-13 | +9.3 | 23-12 | 19-17 | 3-1 | 1-3 | 3-1 | +1.3 | 3-1 | 2-2 |
| off a upset loss as a favorite | 15-10 | 9-16 | 17-9 | -1.1 | 13-13 | 10-16 | 3-2 | 2-3 | 3-2 | -7.6 | 4-1 | 2-3 |
| off an upset loss as a home favorite | 12-6 | 6-12 | 13-6 | +6.5 | 11-8 | 6-13 | 3-0 | 1-2 | 3-0 | +3 | 3-0 | 1-2 |
| revenging a loss versus opponent | 37-38 | 36-41 | 40-37 | +3.5 | 43-32 | 41-35 | 5-5 | 3-7 | 6-4 | -4.8 | 7-3 | 5-5 |
| revenging a same season loss versus opponent | 31-26 | 27-32 | 33-26 | +12.1 | 34-23 | 34-24 | 4-2 | 2-4 | 5-1 | +3.1 | 5-1 | 3-3 |
| revenging a road loss versus opponent | 16-18 | 16-20 | 17-19 | -9.5 | 18-16 | 18-17 | 2-2 | 1-3 | 2-2 | -8.6 | 2-2 | 2-2 |
| revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a favorite | 14-10 | 12-12 | 19-5 | +10.7 | 13-11 | 14-10 | 2-2 | 1-3 | 3-1 | -0.1 | 3-1 | 2-2 |
| revenging a loss versus opponent as a road favorite | 3-2 | 3-2 | 4-1 | 0 | 3-2 | 3-2 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 1-0 | +1 | 1-0 | 0-1 |
| after playing a home game | 45-43 | 47-42 | 54-37 | +1.3 | 48-40 | 51-38 | 4-5 | 3-5 | 5-4 | -11.3 | 5-4 | 4-4 |
| versus poor 3 point shooting teams - making <=30% of their attempts | 11-11 | 11-10 | 14-8 | -12.6 | 9-12 | 12-10 | 0-3 | 1-1 | 1-2 | -18 | 0-3 | 2-1 |
| versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game | 66-57 | 57-66 | 73-54 | -23.6 | 67-56 | 69-55 | 7-6 | 5-7 | 7-6 | -13.1 | 10-3 | 5-8 |
| versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game | 82-76 | 77-83 | 96-68 | -15.3 | 90-68 | 86-75 | 7-7 | 5-8 | 8-6 | -12.4 | 11-3 | 5-9 |
| versus good defensive teams - shooting pct defense of <=40% | 11-9 | 11-10 | 13-8 | +9.1 | 12-9 | 11-9 | 2-1 | 1-2 | 2-1 | +0.7 | 2-1 | 2-1 |
| versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game | 82-74 | 78-79 | 96-65 | -14.3 | 87-68 | 88-70 | 7-7 | 5-8 | 8-6 | -12.4 | 11-3 | 5-9 |
| vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts | 73-70 | 69-74 | 84-63 | -16.4 | 80-61 | 78-66 | 5-8 | 4-8 | 6-7 | -16.5 | 9-4 | 6-7 |
| versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game | 22-16 | 18-22 | 23-17 | +11.8 | 27-12 | 22-16 | 3-2 | 1-4 | 3-2 | +0.3 | 4-1 | 2-3 |
| versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game | 60-62 | 55-69 | 72-55 | -31.7 | 71-51 | 67-57 | 4-8 | 3-8 | 5-7 | -21.4 | 8-4 | 5-7 |