StatSharp Logo

Swipe left to see more →

Thursday, 07/10/2025 3:00 PM (ET) 
 Gm#RecordOpenLatestML1H
 MIN
 Minnesota
60918-4-6.5-7-300-3.5
 LAS
 Los Angeles
6106-14163.5164+22083

Matchup Content Menu

Swipe left to see more →

Tip SheetSimulation & Ratings🔒Betting Systems🔒Team Trends🔒Team StatsSchedule & ResultsHead-to-Head🔒Coaches🔒

WNBA Simulation & Power Ratings

This page features detailed power rating line projections alongside StatSharp's advanced game simulations, each offering precise projected scores and game statistics, estimated fair market lines, positive expected value percentages, and projected hit rates against both the side and total lines. Both sections clearly identify potential betting advantages by highlighting significant value edges when they occur. Use this comprehensive analysis to confidently identify the strongest wagering opportunities available.

Power Rating Projections

Compare team strength with power ratings based on recent results versus expectations. Identify potential advantages where ratings differ from the actual line.

Swipe left to see more →

 Power Rating
TeamsRatingEstimateActualEdge
 MIN Minnesota86-9-7MIN (+2)
 LAS Los Angeles75 

Game Simulation Results

This table shows projected scores and stats from simulations, including shooting, free throws, and rebounding. Edges highlight potential advantages versus the current line.

Swipe left to see more →

Average projected scores and game statistics.
 Scores, EdgesShooting   3pt ShootingFree ThrowsRebounding 
TeamsScoreEdgeH1ScoreEdge3FGM-APct.3FGM-APct.FTM-APct.Tot.OFFTO
 MIN Minnesota82 41 31-6846.1%8-2534.2%11-1480.0%40713
 LAS Los Angeles78LAS (+2)Un (+4.1)39LAS (+1.5)Un (+2.6)28-6642.5%7-2431.3%14-1976.5%43916

Simulation Line Covers

Swipe left to see more →

The number of simulations in which each team covered the current spread, won the game straight up, and number of simulations which went over or under the current total are listed below. Edges are indicated where one side enjoyed a significant advantage against the line or total.
In 1000 simulated games, Los Angeles covered the spread 546 times, while Minnesota covered the spread 430 times.
Edge against the spread=Los Angeles.
In 1000 simulated games, 610 games went under the total, while 366 games went over the total.
Edge against the total=Under.
In 1000 simulated games, Minnesota won the game straight up 631 times, while Los Angeles won 348 times.
Edge on the money line=Los Angeles.
In 1000 simulated games, Los Angeles covered the first half line 551 times, while Minnesota covered the first half line 449 times.
No Edge.
In 1000 simulated games, 589 games went under the first half total, while 371 games went over the first half total.
Edge against the first half total=Under.
In 1000 simulated games, Los Angeles covered the 4 point teaser line 639 times, and failed to cover 335 times.
No Edge.
In 1000 simulated games, Minnesota covered the 4 point teaser line 539 times, and failed to cover 426 times.
No Edge.
In 1000 simulated games, 480 games went over the 4 point teaser total, while 496 failed to go over.
No Edge.
In 1000 simulated games, 701 games went under the 4 point teaser total, while 279 failed to go under.
No Edge.

Potential Trends Based On Simulator Projection

Trends Favoring Minnesota.
Bet against Los Angeles in away games when they allow 82 to 87 points in a game.
Los Angeles record since the 2024 season: 0-9 (0%) ATS with an average line of +1.1. (-9.9 unit$, ROI=-100.0%).
The average score of these games was Sparks 74.4, Opponents 84.0.
Bet against Los Angeles in away games when they attempt 4 to 9 more free throws than opponents in a game.
Los Angeles record since the 2024 season: 0-8 (0%) ATS with an average line of +2.4. (-8.8 unit$, ROI=-100.0%).
The average score of these games was Sparks 71.5, Opponents 83.0.
Bet against Los Angeles in away games when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game.
Los Angeles record since the 2024 season: 0-7 (0%) ATS with an average line of +1.4. (-7.7 unit$, ROI=-100.0%).
The average score of these games was Sparks 76.6, Opponents 89.4.
Bet against Los Angeles in away games when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game.
Los Angeles record since the 2024 season: 2-14 (13%) ATS with an average line of +2.8. (-13.4 unit$, ROI=-76.1%).
The average score of these games was Sparks 76.2, Opponents 85.9.
Bet on Minnesota on the money line when they score 82 to 87 points in a game.
Minnesota record since the 2024 season: 15-3 (83%) with an average money line of -275. (+14.5 unit$, ROI=29.3%)
The average score of these games was Lynx 83.8, Opponents 74.7.
Bet on Minnesota in away games on the money line when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game.
Minnesota record since the 2023 season: 13-2 (87%) with an average money line of -140. (+18.0 unit$, ROI=85.9%)
The average score of these games was Lynx 80.8, Opponents 77.9.
Bet on Minnesota on the money line when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game.
Minnesota record since the 2023 season: 25-6 (81%) with an average money line of -245. (+21.3 unit$, ROI=28.0%)
The average score of these games was Lynx 85.3, Opponents 79.4.
Bet against Los Angeles on the money line when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game.
Los Angeles record during the 2025 season: 2-8 (20%) with an average money line of +133. (-10.8 unit$, ROI=-108.0%)
The average score of these games was Sparks 80.9, Opponents 88.3.
Bet against Los Angeles on the money line when they score 76 to 81 points in a game.
Los Angeles record since the 2024 season: 1-13 (7%) with an average money line of +247. (-14.7 unit$, ROI=-105.0%)
The average score of these games was Sparks 79.4, Opponents 88.5.
Bet against Los Angeles on the money line when they allow 82 to 87 points in a game.
Los Angeles record since the 2024 season: 2-13 (13%) with an average money line of +138. (-15.9 unit$, ROI=-105.7%)
The average score of these games was Sparks 74.9, Opponents 84.4.
Bet against Los Angeles on the money line when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game.
Los Angeles record since the 2024 season: 3-23 (12%) with an average money line of +204. (-25.0 unit$, ROI=-96.2%)
The average score of these games was Sparks 78.0, Opponents 86.3.
Bet against Los Angeles on the money line when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game.
Los Angeles record since the 2024 season: 1-12 (8%) with an average money line of +252. (-13.5 unit$, ROI=-103.5%)
The average score of these games was Sparks 76.9, Opponents 85.6.
Bet against Los Angeles on the money line when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game.
Los Angeles record during the 2025 season: 1-5 (17%) with an average money line of -134. (-10.7 unit$, ROI=-132.9%)
The average score of these games was Sparks 80.8, Opponents 87.2.
Bet against Los Angeles on the money line in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers.
Los Angeles record during the 2025 season: 2-10 (17%) with an average money line of -117. (-17.9 unit$, ROI=-127.5%)
The average score of these games was Sparks 82.4, Opponents 88.1.
Trends Favoring Los Angeles.
Bet against Minnesota on the 1st half line when they have the around same number of rebounds as their opponents in a game.
Minnesota record on the 1st half line during the 2025 season: 0-7 (0%) with an average 1st half line of -3.5. (-7.7 unit$, ROI=-100.0%)
The average 1st half score of these games was Lynx 42.3, Opponents 42.4.
Bet against Minnesota on the 1st half line when they grab 37 to 41 rebounds in a game.
Minnesota record on the 1st half line during the 2025 season: 0-6 (0%) with an average 1st half line of -6.0. (-6.6 unit$, ROI=-100.0%)
The average 1st half score of these games was Lynx 39.8, Opponents 40.2.
Trends Favoring Over.
Bet over the 1st half total in Minnesota away games when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game.
The 1st half Over's record since the 2024 season: 11-0 (100%) with an average 1st half over/under of 81.5. (+11.0 unit$, ROI=90.9%)
The average score of these games was Lynx 46.2, Opponents 45.2.
Glossary of Terms

Teams: The names and logos of the basketball teams being compared in the simulation.

Rating: The power rating assigned to the team, indicating its overall strength based on various factors like performance, statistics, and other metrics.

Score: The average projected final score for each team based on the simulation.

Estimate: The estimated point spread or line based on the power rating comparison between the two teams.

Edge: Indicates a potential betting advantage if the estimated score or line differs significantly from the actual betting line.

H1Score: The average projected score for each team at the end of the first half.

3FGM-A: The average number of three-point field goals made and attempted by the team.

Pct. (3pt Shooting): The average shooting percentage for three-point field goals.

FTM-A: The average number of free throws made and attempted by the team.

Pct. (Free Throws): The average free throw shooting percentage.

Tot. (Rebounding): The average total number of rebounds (both offensive and defensive) secured by the team.

OFF (Rebounding): The average number of offensive rebounds secured by the team.

TO: The average number of turnovers committed by the team.