StatSharp Logo

Swipe left to see more →

Thursday, 07/03/2025 8:00 PM (ET) 
 Gm#RecordOpenLatestML1H
 WAS
 Washington
6098-10159.5155+50078.5
 MIN
 Minnesota
61015-3-14.5-11.5-750-6.5

Matchup Content Menu

Swipe left to see more →

Tip SheetSimulation & Ratings🔒Betting Systems🔒Team Trends🔒Team StatsSchedule & ResultsHead-to-Head🔒Coaches🔒

WNBA Simulation & Power Ratings

This page features detailed power rating line projections alongside StatSharp's advanced game simulations, each offering precise projected scores and game statistics, estimated fair market lines, positive expected value percentages, and projected hit rates against both the side and total lines. Both sections clearly identify potential betting advantages by highlighting significant value edges when they occur. Use this comprehensive analysis to confidently identify the strongest wagering opportunities available.

Power Rating Projections

Compare team strength with power ratings based on recent results versus expectations. Identify potential advantages where ratings differ from the actual line.

Swipe left to see more →

 Power Rating
TeamsRatingEstimateActualEdge
 WAS Washington81 WAS (+2.5)
 MIN Minnesota88-9-11.5

Game Simulation Results

This table shows projected scores and stats from simulations, including shooting, free throws, and rebounding. Edges highlight potential advantages versus the current line.

Swipe left to see more →

Average projected scores and game statistics.
 Scores, EdgesShooting   3pt ShootingFree ThrowsRebounding 
TeamsScoreEdgeH1ScoreEdge3FGM-APct.3FGM-APct.FTM-APct.Tot.OFFTO
 WAS Washington74WAS (+5.5)Ov (+0.1)37WAS (+3.5) 27-6641.3%7-2034.6%13-1776.5%43916
 MIN Minnesota81 40Un (+0.6)29-6545.0%8-2433.2%14-1880.0%41714

Simulation Line Covers

Swipe left to see more →

The number of simulations in which each team covered the current spread, won the game straight up, and number of simulations which went over or under the current total are listed below. Edges are indicated where one side enjoyed a significant advantage against the line or total.
In 1000 simulated games, Washington covered the spread 649 times, while Minnesota covered the spread 351 times.
Edge against the spread=Washington.
In 1000 simulated games, 508 games went over the total, while 475 games went under the total.
No Edge.
In 1000 simulated games, Minnesota won the game straight up 656 times, while Washington won 322 times.
Edge on the money line=Washington.
In 1000 simulated games, Washington covered the first half line 640 times, while Minnesota covered the first half line 360 times.
Edge against the first half line=Washington.
In 1000 simulated games, 521 games went under the first half total, while 479 games went over the first half total.
No Edge.
In 1000 simulated games, Minnesota covered the 4 point teaser line 469 times, and failed to cover 531 times.
No Edge.
In 1000 simulated games, Washington covered the 4 point teaser line 746 times, and failed to cover 254 times.
No Edge.
In 1000 simulated games, 610 games went over the 4 point teaser total, while 367 failed to go over.
No Edge.
In 1000 simulated games, 582 games went under the 4 point teaser total, while 385 failed to go under.
No Edge.

Potential Trends Based On Simulator Projection

Trends Favoring Washington.
Bet on Washington when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game.
Washington record since the 2024 season: 16-3 (84%) ATS with an average line of +6.9. (+12.7 unit$, ROI=60.8%).
The average score of these games was Mystics 77.1, Opponents 80.0.
Bet on Washington on the 1st half line when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game.
Washington record on the 1st half line since the 2024 season: 15-3 (83%) with an average 1st half line of +3.5. (+11.7 unit$, ROI=56.0%)
The average 1st half score of these games was Mystics 42.1, Opponents 38.8.
Trends Favoring Minnesota.
Bet on Minnesota on the money line when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game.
Minnesota record since the 2024 season: 16-2 (89%) with an average money line of -287. (+15.9 unit$, ROI=30.7%)
The average score of these games was Lynx 83.8, Opponents 75.6.
Bet on Minnesota in home games on the money line when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game.
Minnesota record since the 2024 season: 9-1 (90%) with an average money line of -387. (+9.1 unit$, ROI=23.4%)
The average score of these games was Lynx 81.8, Opponents 73.5.
Trends Favoring Over.
Bet over the 1st half total in Washington games when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents.
The 1st half Over's record since the 2024 season: 16-3 (84%) with an average 1st half over/under of 82.0. (+12.7 unit$, ROI=57.7%)
The average score of these games was Mystics 42.7, Opponents 44.2.
Bet over the 1st half total in Minnesota games when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game.
The 1st half Over's record since the 2023 season: 25-5 (83%) with an average 1st half over/under of 81.5. (+19.5 unit$, ROI=59.1%)
The average score of these games was Lynx 44.6, Opponents 41.5.
Trends Favoring Under.
Bet under the total in Washington games when they score 70 to 75 points in a game.
The Under's record since the 2024 season: 11-0 (100%) with an average over/under of 159.9. (+11.0 unit$, ROI=90.9%)
The average score of these games was Mystics 72.5, Opponents 76.8.
Bet under the total in Minnesota games when they score 76 to 81 points in a game.
The Under's record since the 2024 season: 12-1 (92%) with an average over/under of 159.4. (+10.9 unit$, ROI=76.2%)
The average score of these games was Lynx 78.0, Opponents 73.2.
Bet under the total in Minnesota away games in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers.
The Under's record since the 2024 season: 13-2 (87%) with an average over/under of 159.7. (+10.8 unit$, ROI=65.5%)
The average score of these games was Lynx 75.8, Opponents 71.1.
Bet under the 1st half total in Washington away games when they allow 76 to 81 points in a game.
The 1st half Under's record since the 2024 season: 6-0 (100%) with an average 1st half over/under of 81.0. (+6.0 unit$, ROI=90.9%)
The average score of these games was Mystics 36.5, Opponents 36.3.
Glossary of Terms

Teams: The names and logos of the basketball teams being compared in the simulation.

Rating: The power rating assigned to the team, indicating its overall strength based on various factors like performance, statistics, and other metrics.

Score: The average projected final score for each team based on the simulation.

Estimate: The estimated point spread or line based on the power rating comparison between the two teams.

Edge: Indicates a potential betting advantage if the estimated score or line differs significantly from the actual betting line.

H1Score: The average projected score for each team at the end of the first half.

3FGM-A: The average number of three-point field goals made and attempted by the team.

Pct. (3pt Shooting): The average shooting percentage for three-point field goals.

FTM-A: The average number of free throws made and attempted by the team.

Pct. (Free Throws): The average free throw shooting percentage.

Tot. (Rebounding): The average total number of rebounds (both offensive and defensive) secured by the team.

OFF (Rebounding): The average number of offensive rebounds secured by the team.

TO: The average number of turnovers committed by the team.